K. Zdepski
My feedback
72 results found
-
4 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
4 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
5 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
6 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
9 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment K. Zdepski supported this idea · -
6 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
10 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
4 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
5 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
4 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
11 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
8 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
51 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
15 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
8 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
24 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
59 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
12 votesK. Zdepski supported this idea ·
-
5 votesK. Zdepski shared this idea ·
Yes please! I think easier citation checking would be beneficial more broadly as well, but we're definitely seeing an uptick in requests for articles that seem very plausible from the cited journal source, but which do not exist.