Diana Daigle
My feedback
27 results found
-
9 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Diana Daigle shared this idea ·
-
3 votes
Diana Daigle shared this idea ·
-
36 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
28 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
33 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
31 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
20 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
12 votes
-
26 votes
-
86 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
Diana Daigle supported this idea ·
This was originally posted in 2019, but I would like to bring this back for consideration - specifically for article requests. Sometimes a request goes through 15 libraries before I discover that I chose the wrong OCLC record or the citation wasn't correct. In my opinion, if the first 7 or 8 libraries couldn't fill it, there is a problem with the record/citation.
I love that we can set up automations so that requests can go directly from the patron to lenders. If there is a problem with a citation, however, it can take a long time for ILL staff to get the request back and fix it.
Thanks for considering!