Skip to content

Aeon Ideas

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

4 results found

  1. Segmented request limits, per location

    For sites with multiple sites, it would be great to set segmented request limits per location instead of one shared request limit across all locations.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. More flexibility with multi-site configurations

    This idea came from a list in preparation for the 2015 Aeon User Symposium.

    Better administrative options for configuring multi-site (not single system contact email, individual request limits per repository, Customization Manager for each Reading Room), better email support for multi-site in Aeon and not relying on Outlook rules to forward email to correct repository)

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Option to only see reading rooms for your site in a multi-site configuration

    Right now only transactions are filtered by site. Staff would like to only see reading rooms (and signed in users) for those associated with their site.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Option to assign a location to an activity to user for filtering in multi-site configurations

    Staff would still be able to see all activities if they chose, but this would give them the option to easily shorten the list without having to use a random field and filter on that.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base