Crystal Mills
My feedback
17 results found
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
13 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Crystal Mills shared this idea ·
-
14 votes
Crystal Mills shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
21 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Crystal Mills commented
My vote would be for a staff-initiated process. We do like to use the numbers of courses with no items for data on our participation rates in the service.
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Crystal Mills commented
We've had this suggestion of flagging courses from our staff as well!
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
Crystal Mills supported this idea ·
This is a required enhancement! We receive our user data from the registrar, and if users make updates to their records at this central point of contact, it should be overwritten on our side. It's come up a few times related to instructor first and last names, and creates an awkward situation when it involves someone who has undertaken a gender transition and here we are still using their old name from the first time the user record was created.