The current support for the ERE form doe not appear to support posting a new note to the Notes Table as is the case with the generic singular forms.
This request is to expand support for the ERE form to allow for posting notes to one or more requests from this form.

test adfasdf

Allow users to remove multiple items from hold in one transaction on web interface.

A user trying to create an account with an email address already in the database is probably already registered and should not be creating another account.

The current message "The <#FIELDNAME> field has a limit of <#FIELDLENGTH> characters." refers back to the database field names such as ItemInfo1. This is confusing to users who don't know which field to correct because the default field name has been changed in the web view.

It would be helpful to have the ability to reference our custom field names in the Status Line messages.

It would be useful to add the notifications related to a single TN to the TN detail page. Patrons could more easily correlate the notifications with the TN.

Some sites would like the ability to customize the notification messages, especially when the do paging based on material type or department.

The Login As option allows staff users to switch accounts, but can pose a security risk if a user clicks cancel as the client will revert back to the previously logged in staff user.

The site would like to be able to temporarily disable photoduplication service availability while the applicable staff person is out of the office. This functionality could be similar to something like disabling ILL services when the library is closed. Perhaps there could be a toggle option that would prevent the photoduplication form from being available to the patron during this time period, along with an explanatory message of the situation.

You currently need to open an individual request and click over to the billing tab in order to print an invoice for a duplication request. We would like to be able to batch print (the same way that we can with callslips) from any grid. Is it possible to add this function to the "Printing" buttons at the top of the staff client?

Hi,

We noticed that when we place requests associated with activities from ArchivesSpace via the ERE form, they don't route to "Awaiting activity processing" We think this is because the requests are created before they are submitted, and the patron adds the activity information after the request is create in Aeon. We may be able to get around this with a routing rule . But for sites like Beinecke that route requests out of "Awaiting Activity Processing" based on activity type, it will be more complicated. Any suggestions? Thanks.

On the queue and flag tables, we used to be able to click a cell and copy just that information. We can't after the new version update. A fix for this would be incredibly beneficial.

It would be nice to have the ability to mark staff as Inactive in the staff client. Our staff list is starting to grow as people rotate through, especially students and project archivists. Marking staff inactive would allow us to filter the list, and also it could be a convenient way to prevent disable inactive accounts from logging in.

Create functionality to allow patrons to schedule appointments.This would also involve a tracking table where if a patron needs to reschedule the scheduled date, the change would be tracked (for reporting purposes). This might also involved the option to cancel an appointment (without necessarily cancelling requests) or to record when a patron is a walk-in.

We have a few custom Awaiting Activity Processing queues, but when we print callslips for all requests awaiting processing, only callslips for the requests in the default Awaiting Activity Processing queue print. We would like all requests in a queue with the State of Awaiting Activity Processing to print.

When patrons register via AeonAuth (non-shib), they are taken to the First Time Users page, asked to click through to agree to the policies, and then directed to the registration page.

NewAuthRegistration (via Shib) behaves differently and there is only one form where both the First Time policies and registration form are present after authentication.

Sites would like for patrons to see the First Time Users page separately from NewAuthRegistration.

Would it be possible to highlight a set of requests from one user, and send a single email to the user?

It would be great to highlight all the requests from each single user at once and then send one collective email to the user.

Several Aeon users at RBMS 2018 have talked about the need for a virtual reading room to provide controlled access to born digital/digitized materials